Article Navigation
- < Previous
- Next >
Journal Article
Get access
, Can-Lan Sun * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +612 626 5367; Fax: +612 625 8950; Email: canlans@umn.edu Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic
Carcinogenesis, Volume 27, Issue 7, July 2006, Pages 1310–1315, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgi276
Published:
25 November 2005
Article history
Received:
06 July 2005
Revision received:
27 October 2005
Accepted:
12 November 2005
Published:
25 November 2005
- Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
-
Cite
Cite
Can-Lan Sun, Jian-Min Yuan, Woon-Puay Koh, Mimi C. Yu, Green tea, black tea and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies, Carcinogenesis, Volume 27, Issue 7, July 2006, Pages 1310–1315, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgi276
Close
Search
Close
Search
Advanced Search
Search Menu
Abstract
Experimental studies have shown that tea and tea polyphenols have anti-carcinogenic properties against breast cancer. A number of epidemiologic studies, both case–control and cohort in design, have examined the possible association between tea intake and breast cancer development in humans. This meta-analysis included 13 papers which examined populations in eight countries and provided data on consumption of either green tea or black tea, or both in relation to breast cancer risk. Summary odds ratios (ORs) for highest versus non/lowest tea consumption level were calculated based on fixed and random effects models. Heterogeneity between studies was examined via the Q statistics. For green tea, the combined results from the four studies indicated a reduced risk of breast cancer for highest versus non/lowest intake (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.61–0.98). For black tea, conflicting results were observed in case–control versus cohort studies. The combined results from the eight case–control studies showed a minor inverse association between black tea consumption and risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84–0.98). This inverse association was stronger in hospital-based (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.50–1.19) than population-based case–control studies (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.81–1.09). Five cohort studies demonstrated a modest increase in risk associated with black tea intake (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.02–1.31). The results of this meta-analysis indicate a lower risk for breast cancer with green tea consumption. Available data suggest a possible late-stage, promotional effect of black tea on breast carcinogenesis.
CI, confidence interval, EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate, HCC, hospital-based case–control study, OR, odds ratio, PCC, population-based case–control study, RR, relative risk
© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Topic:
- heterogeneity
- epidemiologic studies
- tea
- breast cancer
- green tea
- breast cancer risk
Issue Section:
Reviews
You do not currently have access to this article.
Download all slides
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Sign in Register
Institutional access
- Sign in with a library card
- Sign in with username/password
- Recommend to your librarian
Sign in through your institution
Sign in through your institution
Institutional account management
Sign in as administrator
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
- Click Sign in through your institution.
- Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
- When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
- Click Sign in through society site.
- When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
- View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
- View the institutional accounts that are providing access.
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Purchase
Subscription prices and ordering for this journal
Purchasing options for books and journals across Oxford Academic
Short-term Access
To purchase short-term access, please sign in to your personal account above.
Don't already have a personal account? Register
Green tea, black tea and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies - 24 Hours access
EUR €51.00
GBP £44.00
USD $55.00
Advertisement
Citations
Views
11,335
Altmetric
More metrics information
Metrics
Total Views 11,335
10,158 Pageviews
1,177 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2016 | 1 |
December 2016 | 4 |
January 2017 | 5 |
February 2017 | 28 |
March 2017 | 74 |
April 2017 | 31 |
May 2017 | 20 |
June 2017 | 21 |
July 2017 | 13 |
August 2017 | 23 |
September 2017 | 25 |
October 2017 | 28 |
November 2017 | 20 |
December 2017 | 94 |
January 2018 | 122 |
February 2018 | 135 |
March 2018 | 203 |
April 2018 | 167 |
May 2018 | 152 |
June 2018 | 136 |
July 2018 | 125 |
August 2018 | 130 |
September 2018 | 121 |
October 2018 | 137 |
November 2018 | 192 |
December 2018 | 120 |
January 2019 | 97 |
February 2019 | 113 |
March 2019 | 109 |
April 2019 | 168 |
May 2019 | 140 |
June 2019 | 107 |
July 2019 | 136 |
August 2019 | 114 |
September 2019 | 116 |
October 2019 | 155 |
November 2019 | 93 |
December 2019 | 94 |
January 2020 | 103 |
February 2020 | 114 |
March 2020 | 112 |
April 2020 | 122 |
May 2020 | 64 |
June 2020 | 122 |
July 2020 | 104 |
August 2020 | 117 |
September 2020 | 90 |
October 2020 | 131 |
November 2020 | 154 |
December 2020 | 90 |
January 2021 | 102 |
February 2021 | 114 |
March 2021 | 137 |
April 2021 | 163 |
May 2021 | 156 |
June 2021 | 101 |
July 2021 | 119 |
August 2021 | 142 |
September 2021 | 108 |
October 2021 | 178 |
November 2021 | 130 |
December 2021 | 153 |
January 2022 | 244 |
February 2022 | 573 |
March 2022 | 195 |
April 2022 | 177 |
May 2022 | 129 |
June 2022 | 130 |
July 2022 | 159 |
August 2022 | 147 |
September 2022 | 172 |
October 2022 | 139 |
November 2022 | 96 |
December 2022 | 76 |
January 2023 | 122 |
February 2023 | 85 |
March 2023 | 115 |
April 2023 | 71 |
May 2023 | 59 |
June 2023 | 84 |
July 2023 | 98 |
August 2023 | 94 |
September 2023 | 112 |
October 2023 | 142 |
November 2023 | 142 |
December 2023 | 114 |
January 2024 | 170 |
February 2024 | 148 |
March 2024 | 167 |
April 2024 | 186 |
May 2024 | 182 |
June 2024 | 129 |
July 2024 | 134 |
August 2024 | 102 |
September 2024 | 116 |
October 2024 | 22 |
November 2024 | 9 |
Altmetrics
Email alerts
Article activity alert
Advance article alerts
New issue alert
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic
Citing articles via
Google Scholar
-
Latest
-
Most Read
-
Most Cited
More from Oxford Academic
Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
Medicine and Health
Pathology
Books
Journals
Advertisement